Short Assessment · 10 Questions

Dependency Assessment

How much of the business still depends on one person?

Think of the person everyone turns to when something goes wrong. This assessment looks at what still comes back to them, whether anyone else can carry it, and how soon that may matter.

The questions

Where would Mike leave the widest gap?

0 of 10 answered

0 of 10
01 · DependencyWhen this person is unavailable, what happens to difficult decisions?
02 · DependencyWhen the normal process stops fitting the situation, who knows what to do?
03 · DependencyHow dependent are important customer, supplier, or partner relationships on this person personally?
04 · DependencyCould other leaders explain why your important operating rules and practices exist?
05 · ReadinessIs there someone who could take over the most important parts of this person’s work?
06 · ReadinessCan that person handle the hard decisions without checking with the incumbent?
07 · ReadinessHow has the next person learned?
08 · ReadinessWhat has been preserved already?
09 · TimeWhen could this person’s role materially change?
10 · TimeHow much useful access do you still have to them?

Your result is prepared after all ten answers are complete.

About this assessment

About this assessment

This is a Skagway practitioner screening tool, not a validated actuarial, psychometric, or financial-risk model. It is designed to help organizations identify dependencies worth investigating more closely.

How the bands are determined

Dependency scores of 0–3 are lower, 4–7 meaningful, and 8–12 high. Readiness-gap scores of 0–3 are shown as stronger readiness, 4–7 developing, and 8–12 limited. Time-pressure scores of 0–1 are low, 2–3 moderate, and 4–6 high.

A compressed window requires high dependency together with high time pressure, or high dependency and a high readiness gap with at least moderate time pressure. High exposure means high dependency, or meaningful dependency with a high readiness gap. Any remaining dimension above its lower band produces meaningful exposure.

Research basis

The questions borrow their attention from established work. The scoring remains Skagway’s.

NASA and the International Atomic Energy Agency have published practical guidance for identifying knowledge at risk during workforce transitions. Their work draws attention to departure timing, position criticality, access, knowledge-transfer methods, and the need to monitor whether continuity plans remain useful.

SHRM treats succession planning as preparation for critical functions rather than a one-time naming exercise. Deloitte’s 2026 family-business research examines plan maturity and next-generation readiness in its stated survey population. Together, these sources help explain why dependency, readiness, and time deserve separate attention.

None of these organizations created, validated, or endorsed this assessment. Skagway selected the questions and thresholds as a transparent practitioner screen.

A result is a place to begin looking.

Where is your intuition pointing you?

The road ahead should remember how the company came this far.